Valuation vs. Revenue

Last week, a two-year-old protein bar company was valued at US$2.25 Billion.
In the same week, Nestlé sold seven brands from their health portfolio for US$1 billion - brands that did US$1.2 Billion in 2025 sales.
Nature's Bounty, Puritan's Pride, Nuun Hydration and four more went to Yellow Wood Partners, LLC at about 0.8x sales, five years after Nestlé paid US$5.75 billion for the Bountiful brands. Nestlé keeps Solgar® Vitamin & Herb) and Pure Encapsulations - its premium, science-led VMS businesses.
Medici Brands, the parent of David, raised US$250 Million at roughly 7.5x its expected 2026 revenue of US$300 million.
The Nestlé portfolio generates four times David's expected revenue and comes with:
-> Scaled brands
-> Vertical manufacturing
-> Packaging, warehousing, distribution, and broad bricks-and-mortar penetration.
That's a hard-to-recreate operating platform, and potentially an acquisition platform.
Is anyone wondering why there's a 9x gap in what a dollar of revenue is worth?
👉️ Growth.
David went from US$8 million in 2024 to expected 2026 revenue of US$300 million.
👉️ Proof on the label.
We've gone from “What nutrients am I missing?” to “What do I want my nutrition to do for me?”
👉️ An owned input.
David bought its fat-replacer supplier in 2025.. whereas commodity vitamin D has no moat.
Elite sport ran this playbook first: Protein-to-calorie ratio was always a locker-room metric for many years ;)
Pro, then prosumer, then consumer. That's the curve that we love and underwrite at Seveno.
Even so, the direction seems clear. Capital still values scale, but it pays a premium for measurable outcomes, rapid growth and owned inputs.
Follow me Jean-Baptiste Roy, I'm building Seveno Capital, and I write about where sports nutrition, consumer health, and capital converge.


